callback: cb Even in the UK - in Northern Ireland and Scotland - blasphemy is still a crime. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Many believe that blasphemy should be a criminal offence everywhere, as it already is in some countries. United Kingdom. There were no subsequent prosecutions before the 1920–1925 partition of Ireland, or in Northern Ireland subsequently. Answer Blasphemy against the Prophet is a crime which, without shadow of a doubt, deserves to be punished severely, and in its extreme form, where the blasphemy is likely to spread anarchy, a death penalty can even be issued to the perpetrator of the crime. In a number of states with a majority-Christian or formerly majority-Christian population blasphemy laws may criminalize abusive or scurrilous speech about Christianity, and oftentimes, other religions and their adherents, as such offenses "have the tendency to lead to a breach of peace".  Such a law would further deprive British citizens of their birth right: the freedom to express their opinions, without which true liberty is impossible. Blasphemy in the UK History Blasphemy, historically, is somewhat variously defined. window.mc4wp.listeners.push(  The first is to challenge the assertion that Muslims are an especially vulnerable minority. Some religions consider blasphemy to be a religious crime. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. It is worth remembering that Wilders was banned from entering the UK in 2009, due to allegedly posing ‘a threat to national security, public order or the safety of UK citizens,’ although after an appeal the decision was overturned. In the UK the blasphemy law only ever applied to Christianity, and has been abolished. The Hate Crime and Public Order Bill and the new Thought Polis need to join the old blasphemy laws in the dustbin of Scottish history. Addressing a press conference in Lahore, he said that Prime Minister Imran Khan fought the case of Muslims in the UN, he raised the issue of Islamophobia at the global stage. This inevitably presents a warped view of reality.’ The 2019 edition of the Freedom of Thought Report , from Humanists International, has found that blasphemy … The common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel were abolished in England and Wales by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Good luck with your legal strategy in Saudi Arabia or Iran. See also Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006. Anonymous. If the law is passed, Scotland will become the latest in a series of counties, including Denmark, Canada, Greece and Ireland, to decriminalise blasphemy. However, it is in the vagueness of the following excerpt, that, I believe is the cause of our present problems: Use of words or behaviour or display of written material })(); ALTNEWSMEDIA provides an alternative to the fake news mainstream media narrative. “Humanists have been calling on governments everywhere to repeal laws like these in solidarity with the victims of oppressive blasphemy laws around the world,” its chief executive, Andrew Copson, said. The bill comes after a review of Scottish hate crime laws by retired High Court judge Lord Bracadale, who provided a series of recommendations. Write to the Prime Minister: Free speech and hate crime In Europe, there have also been blasphemy cases in a number of countries. Published 25 years before Sir Matthew Hale adjudicated on Taylor’s Case, in 1651, Hobbes’ Leviathan argued that the “state of natur”’ for humans has no naturally shared higher purpose or common good. The Suicide of Europe & the Indian National Register for Citizens, The Truth About The Channel Migrant Crisis. } Mick Hume is a spiked columnist. In the UK, the obsolete blasphemy law was repealed in 2008. (1) A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. STATISTICS & ISLAM: LESSONS FOR THE WEST? “By creating robust laws for the justice system, parliament will send a strong message to victims, perpetrators, communities and to wider society that offences motivated by prejudice will be treated seriously and will not be tolerated.”. The law also contains a clarification which seems to protect the freedom to criticise religion: “Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system”. 6 months ago. Get the News that really matters Blasphemy laws … 6 months ago. Lord Sumner concluded, "Taylor's instance is the central pillar of this part of the law." Blasphemy laws are most common in majority Muslim countries of the Middle East and North Africa, as well as some parts of … Some parts of the bill merely consolidate existing laws on hate crime. As futile as writing to your MP and the PM directly may seem, if it is done in sufficient numbers it may serve to remind the treacherous Conservative party that there is an even bigger voting bloc, called ‘the majority of the British people,’ which will be increasingly unwilling to vote for an Islamophilic, cowardly and freedom-hating political party which is willing to undermine the sacred liberties which have made this country one of the most civilised and free the world has ever known in the pursuit of political expedience. on: function(evt, cb) { The Scottish government has published a bill that would decriminalise blasphemy, more than 175 years after the last case was prosecuted. (function() { I believe it should remain abolished. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies.  To back up this argument, the much-discussed but dubious ‘hate crime’ spike which supposedly occurred in the wake of the Brexit vote is often cited. The legal situation concerning freedom of speech as it stands is a complicated one. Blasphemy 'is no crime', says Macron amid French girl's anti-Islam row This article is more than 9 months old Schoolgirl Mila received death threats after posting anti-religious diatribe on Instagram Maulana Tahir Ashrafi, while announcing to take up this issue in the OIC, has demanded that the United Nations make blasphemy a crime so that this it may never happen again. Everything is instantly logged as a hate incident. {  Silencing Islam’s critics and putting the power to punish its critics in the hands of the Muslim population, will lead to a tyranny of a minority over the British people. Justice minister Humza Yousaf said the law would be modernised and also cover discrimination against age, disability, race, religion and sexual orientation. Britain's ancient laws of blasphemy have been abolished by MPs. Blasphemy and Ireland: Everything you need to know A guide to how the State’s ban on blasphemy became a law Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 00:08 Updated: Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 14:30 Hard-line politicians have often backed severe punishments, partly as a way of shoring up their support base. The bill was welcomed by Humanists UK, which has been campaigning against blasphemy laws since 2015. In any case, why, when we already have a law regarding incitement to religious hatred, albeit one that is inspired by emotional incontinence, a lack of national maturity and a chilling self-righteous intolerance, does Islam need a special law to protect its sensitivities? TRUMP, NETANYAHU & PRINCE CHARLES: NAMASTE IS GOING GLOBAL! Christian preacher arrested for saying homosexuality is a sin . “Stirring up of hatred can contribute to a social atmosphere in which discrimination is accepted as normal,” he said. A Christian street preacher was arrested and locked in a cell for telling a passer-by that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God. No evidence is needed.  A silenced and intimidated non-Muslim majority will likely lead to the elevation of Islam over all other ideologies and religions, and barbarities such as FGM, Sharia Courts, honour killings and anti-Semitism will become more commonplace and unchallenged as a result. Blasphemy is broadly defined as the act of speaking in a way that shows irreverence for God or something sacred., INDIA Vis-A-Vis China : Post Global Pandemic. A family who faced a "very real threat of violence" over a "false blasphemy charge" and attitudes to epilepsy and learning difficulties have won a fight to stay in the UK, an MP has said. New law will also offer wider protection against race, sex, age and religious discrimination, Last modified on Fri 24 Apr 2020 20.34 BST. “Million MAGA March” Attacked By Far Left / BLM Thugs, India: Ramdev’s Pricing of Covid Immunity Booster, India: Amitabh Bachchan Covid Message Is No Longer Music To Our Ears. It was announced yesterday that the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims intended to consult the organisations MEND (Muslim Engagement and Development) and ‘Hope not Hate’ with the goal of creating a ‘working definition’ of ‘Islamophobia.’  Presumably this is the first step towards a law prohibiting it. Public support for the strict blasphemy laws is strong. } Who gives a fúck? Only Queensland and Western Australia have abolished it. Blasphemy features prominently in the news from time to time. Sixty-nine countries have blasphemy laws and penalties have hardened in parts of the world in recent years, according to a report on the status and rights of the non-religious. event : evt, Show more answers (2) Still have questions? The second is the ‘Count Dankula’ ‘Nazi pug’ case which concerned a video in which the phrase “Gas the Jews” was used, although it was clear that no endorsement from the accused of anti-Semitism took place in the Youtube video in question. The use of such laws has sometimes become tied … The crime of blasphemy Blasphemy is a crime against the common law (the body of judge-made law we inherited from England). These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.  It would be unrealistic to suggest that no Muslims face any kind of abuse and discrimination in Britain in 2018. Anonymous. window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || { This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. This represents another landmark in Britain and Europe’s internalisation of Islamic special pleading and rejection of traditional European values of freedom of speech and thought and the freedom to ridicule and satirise religion – freedoms long fought and hard won. Why Should The Indian Film Industry Shift Out Of Mumbai (Maharashtra) . The United Kingdom is a unitary sovereign state made up of four constituent countries: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.  Some would argue it is because Muslims are a beleaguered, vulnerable minority facing terrible discrimination and thus need a special law to protect them.  In any case, the context was ignored and a hate speech conviction was secured.  However, it is certainly highly questionable whether they suffer any more than any other group, especially in Britain, where the BBC, the British state school system, and the majority of the mainstream media bend over backwards to accommodate Islam. 3 2. Blasphemy is a crime in some countries, yes. France had just come out of the fifth anniversary of the massacre at its satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo than it was plunged into a similar case. 1 1. © 2020 AltNewsMedia. ); before a jury, in the Crown Court and the maximum penalty is imprisonment for life and/or a fine. With regards to the oft-cited ‘hate crime epidemic’ it is not widely known how this is calculated. This must be opposed. The devolved administration in Edinburgh said the continued criminalisation of blasphemy, which falls under hate crime laws, “no longer reflects the kind of society in which we live”. The first problem is the use of the word ‘threatening.’  In our current climate of ‘micro-aggressions’, expressions of conservative opinions are often described as a form of violence. Blasphemy is broadly defined as the act of speaking in a way that shows irreverence for God or something sacred. In England and Wales the “blasphemy” and “blasphemous libel” laws were abolished in 2008. Blasphemy laws were repealed in England and Wales in 2008. DYSTOPIA: A SOCIETY BUILT AND NURTURED BY THE LEFT. With regards to the oft-cited ‘hate crime epidemic’ it is not widely known how this is calculated. forms: { 1 1. We are urging people to write to their MLA in Northern Ireland to make a stand and say that blasphemy laws do not belong in any country.’ NOTES: Blasphemy is a crime at common law, and if it is published there is no need to show an intention to shock or insult or an awareness that the publication is blasphemous. New York “Anti-Semitic and Hindu Bashing” Times? But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Get … Blasphemy is still technically a crime in many countries, including the UK. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Blasphemy was abolished as an offence in England and Wales in 2008, but it remains in Scotland and Northern Ireland, says The Independent. } The second problem is the use of the words ‘if he intends to thereby stir up religious hatred.’. All Rights Reserved. } It also repeals a centuries-old offence of blasphemy – against Christians – which is … Only in places such as Arabia. This requires two rebuttals. Earlier this year, Scotland was on the verge of banning the “crime” of blasphemy.The nation had proposed a new Hate Crimes Bill, designed to modernize the law, that included a clause abolishing “blasphemy” as a crime.That was great news! there are many different religions present in England but blasphemy as a criminal offence has not been prosecuted for many many years. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. It's surprising that no-one has ever used the defence of it being a victimless crime and …  The law introduced in 2006 regarding ‘incitement to racial and religious hatred’ describes below what constitutes religious hatred: ‘In this Part “religious hatred” means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.’.  Consider these developments with a clumsy ‘anti-Islamophobia’ law piled on top and the prospect of the British living under the yoke of an Islamic blasphemy law begins to take form. Meanwhile another Ahmadi Muslim — 81-year-old Shukoor Ahmad — serves an eight-year prison term for the same alleged crime of blasphemy. These cookies do not store any personal information. In 2003 the UK House of Lords Committee on Religious Offences in England and Wales said it was "arguable that the crime [of blasphemy] did not survive the disestablishment". In Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 the House of Lords held that the gist of the crime of blasphemy was not the words that were used rather it was: The issue of blasphemy laws and other restrictions on freedom of expression in Pakistan consistently garners headlines, with controversial decisions ranging from a May 2010 ban on access to the social-networking website Facebook and the video-sharing site YouTube to the imposition of death sentences for blasphemy convictions. When these two rebuttals are considered alongside the assertions made by MPs, such as the alleged conservative Anne Soubry, that this soar in ‘hate crime’ necessitates the creation of a definition of Islamophobia, it can either mean that the British political establishment is myopically unwilling to consider the breadth of the evidence on this issue, or, as I suspect, is so terrified of a growing Muslim community in Britain, one which will form an influential voting bloc in years to come, that special pleading on behalf of one minority at the expense of the freedoms of the majority are a price worth paying for a quiet life. AltNewsMedia uses cookies to improve your experience. However similar laws remain on the books in Scotland and in Northern Ireland. 5 SIMPLE QUESTIONS FOR THE COVID VACCINATORS! Justice secretary and MSP Humza Yousaf said the law in Scotland would be modernised – the nation’s last blasphemy prosecution was in 1842. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. The Scottish government has published a bill that would decriminalise blasphemy, more than 175 years after the last case was prosecuted. The replacement of blasphemy with hate crime reflects, in effect, the triumph of a Hobbesian view of humans as fundamentally atomised. Being a common law offence, blasphemy is only triable on indictment, i.e. Taylor's Case in 1676 was the very first recorded instance of the common law crime of blasphemy. Prosecutions for blasphemy are now rare and it has been suggested that the crime be abolished. In the times of the Old Testament, blasphemy was punishable by death, and it used to be a criminal offense in many Western states.Although many of these laws may still exist on the statute books as technicalities, they are not now enforced, or at least not with any real punishment, in most western countries. It is uncertain whether or not earlier instances were unnoticed. Introduction. The last recorded charge of blasphemy in Scotland was brought against bookseller Thomas Paterson for “exhibiting placards of a profane nature” in his shop window in 1842. This would be the latest successful "blasphemy" prosecution in the United Kingdom. Two recent developments have lowered the standard of evidence relating to intent to an extremely worrying degree. Some religions consider blasphemy to be a religious crime. These excerpts seem to limit the scope of the law to the hatred of people, not ideology, and protects citizens’ rights to attack ideologies, clearly separating it from attacks on people.  It would also undermine the ability of the British public to challenge and encourage the reform of Islam, which, in its current state is clearly incompatible with a free, liberal democracy.  This echoes the assertion made by Dutch politician Geert Wilders that he is opposed not to Muslims, but to Islam. Blasphemy was outlawed in England and Wales, with an amendment striking them off of the books in 2008.  As Brendan O’Neill in the Spectator pointed out back in 2016, the standards of evidence in the reporting of ‘hate crime’  are brought into serious doubt by the fact that a number of these incidents are reported through the website ‘True Vision’ which requires no evidence and can be used anonymously: ‘Many of these incidents (the police can’t at the moment say how many) were reported through True Vision, a police-funded website that allows anyone anywhere to report something they either experienced or witnessed, anonymously if they like. The first is the standard of evidence for pursuing a hate speech conviction described by police forces such as the Cheshire police who describe it thus: ‘Hate crime is any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a personal characteristic.’  So, it is the perception by a second or third party which forms the basis of intent, not the content of the words expressed or the context in which they were said. listeners: [],